James Hurley, MSN Music Editor | ![]() |
John Leckie
![]() |
Well, it becomes special! We didn’t expect to be talking about it 20 years later; but at the time we tried to put as much positive energy as possible in to the record, so yeah we expected it to do well and its usually a disappointment if it doesn’t. When it did come out it wasn’t in the charts, and in those days there was a big thing about getting on Top Of The Pops, which we did do but not until Fools Gold which was the fifth single.
But it’s not like that anymore because it’s not so focused on the charts, You just go on to another chart, so it doesn’t count anymore and that’s a real disappointment. And not having Top Of The Pops on the TV is a shame – someone must be able to do it right somehow. We can’t live with Jools Holland forever!
That’s absolutely true – it was worked on as a B-side and What The World Is Waiting For was considered the A-side.
So it just goes to show that the band and the people around them don’t always know best...
No, it might well have come from the band saying this is the song and Fools Gold is the groove – maybe they thought to have a hit single you have to have a song, not that Fools Gold isn’t a song, but it isn’t a conventional song like What The World Is Waiting For is.
When you where originally asked to produce the album did you know anything about the band?
Not really, but just before that I had done some tracks with The LAs in Liverpool and someone there told me about this band from Manchester called The Angry Young Teddy Bears who wanted to work with me, so I told them to ring me up. When I met the Stone Roses John Squire said, “You do know we used to be called The Angry Young Teddy Bears?”, so there was a vague connection before, but no, I didn’t know them. I had never met them.
What where your first impressions of them as people?
They were great, they way they are, or were, is the way they are all the time with everyone; they’re vibey, happy and fun. I met them on stage at International 2 because Gareth who was the manager ran these two clubs called International 1 and 2 so the Roses could rehearse on stage in the morning until the sound check at four, but all day they got to rehearse on that big stage, which was good for them because it meant they could practice their poses! And that’s how we met, they were buzzing, everyone was buzzing and off we went.
No, I didn’t actually. I wouldn’t call his voice limited, he has quite a range but I think it was all about confidence. He probably sings a lot better on the first record than he does now. But at the time I didn’t have a problem, no more than with any other band. We would wait until we got a good one and then say that’s the best one, that’s the way to do it, but maybe the second verse is better from another take, so there was a little editing going on but nothing like what you do today on the computer because it was all done on tape.
There was no auto tune in those days.
No auto tune, no editing, no copy and pasting really – you could with a lot of messing about but it was better to go and sing it again, which is still the way really!
Do you think it’s almost too easy now?
Yeah, it’s crazy. It’s not any quicker and it’s not any better. The outcome you could argue is worse, but it’s just different, you get a different result using the computer than the tape. But there’s something about the 25 best records of all time and it’s probably because they were all made on tape.
To get back to the Stone Roses album, how did they work in the studio? Were the songs all carefully worked out in advance or did they improvise?
Most of the songs where rehearsed in advance, apart from probably Bye Bye Bad Man and I Am The Resurrection which we worked up when we went to Rockfield. We spent a few days rehearsing in the studio which is always a bit of a panic when you are meant to be recording but haven’t written a song yet. So yeah, pretty much all of the songs were worked out, as you will hear with the demos that are coming with the box set.
I have heard the demos you're talking about and that very famous second half of I Am The Resurrection in the final version sounds nothing like the demo, so that was something that was worked on quite meticulously, I would imagine?
That’s right, usually it was the last number of the set and usually they would improvise the end, but when we got to Rockfield we decided we wanted to arrange it really tightly, like four bars of this section, eight bars of that section, Mani’s little bass thing, and it was all recorded in one go. I think if we had done it with a computer we probably would have done it all in sections and joined it together, but what we were insistent on doing was rehearsing it as a band arrangement so the whole end section is them playing.
So the end section is all one take?
Yeah, if you work and work and get a magic take what you get is something much better than something chopped together on the computer. It’s organic. None of the record, except for Fools Gold, is done to a click track, which a lot of people swear by now.
Do you ever listen to any of the albums you produce for pleasure or do they remain as work in your mind?
Well they do for a year or so after, but then I can listen to them.
We have to briefly touch on Second Coming. Not the most brilliant experience of your life?
No, it wasn’t.
What do you think went wrong?
To this day I don’t know really. I think things just got out of balance between them. Other things became more important than music and being in a band. It was difficult to get them all in a room together and get the flow of some tracks down they way we used to. It was always one step forward, two steps back.
My understanding is that John was very much in control of what was going on then and the partnership with Ian wasn’t in place as it was before. Would that be right?
Before I always saw it as the four of them, not just John and Ian, but they were all separate people. Mani and Ian always wanted to get them together and there was always a lot of positivity, it was always great fun but the work just wasn’t getting done and people where going off and having babies and had different domestic things happening, management things, all different kinds of things were going on, and right at the bottom of the list was writing songs and making a record. But they did have quite a few songs, but it’s how they were delivered that was the problem. There wasn’t a shortage of songs for the second album.
It just occurred to me that they may have been burdened with the expectation to match the first album and that could have made them freeze a bit?
Yeah, especially because it was a few years later and people grow up, it’s very difficult to recapture where you were when you were 21 or 22 when you're getting on for 30.
We talked about Fools Gold earlier, do you think that was a direction they should have gone in? Because they went for this retro 70s, almost Led Zeppelin sound.
After Fools Gold they did One Love which was similar to Fools Gold, but maybe the song wasn’t as strong unfortunately, and the B-side to Something’s Burning is a really good track as well and they were going to be the start of the second album. One Love was going to be the first track on album two for Silvertone, and that’s when the court case happened – it’s all Geffen’s fault really! Anyway, people have written books about it already.
Supposing Geffen hadn’t have come in and the court case hadn’t have happened, do you think the album would have been a lot different?
Yeah it would have been a lot quicker, and we would have kept it in Britain – what on earth where a LA record company doing snooping around our band! There is something distinctly British about the Roses. The American company never came to the studio and we never had any contact, they only met the band when they signed the deal, shook hands said thank you – there was never any creativity coming from Geffen.
Do you think there’s any chance that they will reunite, or is that pretty much it?
That’s pretty much it...Unless...I don’t know, I really don’t know.
If they did, and they asked you to produce another album for them, would you?
Of course I would.

MORE ON MSN MUSIC
Despite the late hour (it started at 1am), the stars and more than a few nutters were out in force for the premiere of the Michael Jackson documentary, This Is It.
Free Robbie album downloadCan't wait for Robbie Williams' comeback album to be released on November 9? Neither can we. So why not download a free preview version of it here? Shhhh, don't tell anyone.
MTV Europe Music AwardsTaking place on November 5 in Berlin, the MTV EMAs are bound to produce fireworks (do you see what we did there?). Get the full lowdown on the nominees with our huge preview special.
Confused by the Sugababes saga?First it looks like Amelle is off, then Keisha gets the boot, then Amelle has a breakdown, then Heidi burst into tears in public, then the new lineup's first performance is cancelled... it's not easy to keep track. Untangle the story here.
ADVERTISEMENT
QUESTION OF THE WEEK
- What will happen next in the Russell Brand/Katy Perry romance?
- They’ll split up by Christmas
21% - They’ll get engaged
17% - Russell will cheat on Katy
22% - Katy will get pregnant
9% - A sex tape will be leaked
19% - They'll record a duet
3% - She’ll kiss a girl… and like it
9%
- They’ll split up by Christmas
Top Story
Top Story
Play our brand new and addictive version of Trumps, by pitching pop stars off against each other...
Top Story
No one would dare take on this quiz, but with the help of Live Search you MAY have a chance...
Top Story
Check out the first of our Xclusives sessions featuring Pussycat Dolls, The Saturdays, The Fratellis and Bryn Christopher...
POPULAR SEARCHES

Become a fan of MSN Entertainment on Facebook, get instant updates by following us on Twitter and find out how to get news, views and reviews on the move with entertainment on your mobile.










